|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT LASER HAIR REMOVAL
1.
Laser Hair Removal History
2. Choice of Wavelength
3. Speed and Cost Effectiveness
Table 1
Table 2
I.
LASER HAIR REMOVAL HISTORY
Laser light as a tool for unwanted hair removal was first introduced
to te US market in 1995, when ThermoLase Corporation (San Diego,
CA) received FDA clearance for its hair removal device based on
the Nd:YAG laser. The method suggested use of infrared (1064 nm
wavelength) laser light in conjunction with a topical light absorbing
solution. Though the long lasting effects of that first laser hair
removal approach were questionable (in terms of its comparison with
electrolysis), its speed and virtual painlessness were so attractive
that laser hair removal soon became very popular. It was soon found
out that best results in hair removal can be achieved only when
the unique laser light property is correctly utilized. The fact
that laser emits its light energy in very narrow spectral range
(usually represented in laser specifications by peek emitting wavelength),
makes it possible to effectively deliver laser energy right to the
hair follicle, without damage to surrounding skin layers. That's
why the search for the laser which would be best choice for hair
removal application has started right after the first laser appeared
in the market. After number of clinical studies have been performed,
the best results were demonstrated with three types of lasers: Ruby
laser emitting a 694 nm (red) wavelength and Alexandrite laser that
operates at 755 nm(near infrared) frequency and the diode laser
(810 nm frequency). The clinical advantage of these two lasers was
based on the big difference in absorption between upper skin layers
(epidermis) and hair follicles containing hair follicles was called
selective photothermolysis and is illustrated in the Choice of Wavelength
section below, where we give a more detailed description of the
laser hair removal physics. Since 1997 many companies in the USA
and Europe introduced new laser hair removal devices. The lasers
for hair removal today come in all shapes and sizes. There are also
different lasers that use different wavelengths of light. Some utilize
a cooling device and some do not. All laser systems emit a gentle
beam of light that passes through the skin to the hair follicle
where it is absorbed by the hair. Among all these systems the Alexandrite
laser based devices have won the biggest market share. The popularity
of these lasers is based on preferable wavelength of 755 nm, high
energy per pulse, which can be delivered at higher speed from more
compact package, than in competing Ruby Lasers.
Return
to questions
II.
CHOICE OF WAVELENGTH
Most of the modern laser hair removal systems operate based on Anderson
and Parrish's 1981 principle of selective photothermolysis. Under
the principle of selective pholothermolysis, when a pigmented target
absorbs a particular wavelength of light in an amount of time that
is shorter than or equal to the thermal relaxation time of the targeted
structure, the targeted tissue will be selectively destroyed without
surrounding tissue injury. The absorption properties of the main
chromophore of hair follicles - melanin, and surrounding epidermis
have suggested that lasers emitting light in red and near infrared
spectrum are the best light sources for the hair removal. Since
melanin in the hair shaft/bulb is the primary chromophore for laser
hair removal and because one of these targets (bulb) may be located
up to 5mm below the skin surface, the optimal choice of wavelength
depends on both skin penetration depth and melanin absorption. For
a typical hair bulb diameter of 0.3 mm located 3 mm below the skin
surface, the calculations show that among popular wavelengths used
for hair removal, the wavelengths in 640-810 nm produce the highest
temperature rise per unit fluence (laser thermal efficiency in the
hair bulb).
Temperature rise in a 0.3 mm diameter hair bulb per unit fluence
as a function of wavelength. In simple words, the lasers operating
at preferable wavelengths can deliver more heating damage to the
hair bulb without burning the surrounding skin. This property of
the laser light also gives it substantial advantage when laser is
compared to non-laser hair removal devices (such as flashlamp-type
light sources with very broad emission spectrum). Currently, only
three types of solid-state lasers emit light at the appropriate
wavelengths and with sufficient output energy for the hair removal
procedure. These lasers are Ruby laser (694 nm output wavelength
and Alexandrite laser (755 nm central output wavelength) and the
diode laser (810nm output wavelength). Recent studies have shown
that the clinical results achieved by the three types of lasers
are on par, so the technical differences between two lasers are
usually seen as an advantage of the Alexandrite.
Return to questions
III. SPEED AND COST EFFECTIVENESS
The practitioners involved in hair removal procedures always pay
attention to the time required to perform certain hair removal procedures.
This time eventually determines the cost of the treatment and it
strongly depends on the laser performance characteristics. In terms
of pulsed lasers there are only two ways to increase the coverage
rate of a treatment: increase the pulse repetition frequency (rep.
Rate), or increase the spot size. How fast a laser covers a treatment
area is a product of the spot size and repetition rate (see table
1).
Return to questions
Table
1
OPTIMAL
COVERAGE RATES OF VARIOUS LASERS
|
Spot
Size
|
Repetition
Rate
|
Area
Coverage Rate
|
|
15mm
|
1Hz
|
1.8Cm2/sec
|
|
12mm
|
2Hz
|
2.3
m2/sec
|
|
10mm
|
3Hz
|
2.4m2/sec
|
|
9x9mm
|
3Hz
|
1.9cm2/sec
|
|
7mm
|
5Hz
|
1.9cm2/sec
|
In most laser
designs increase of the spot size and pulse repetition leads to
the lower output energy. This contradiction does not always allow
the laser to achieve high enough fluence (or energy density) required
for efficient hair removal, using relatively big laser beam spot
sizes or the faster repetition rates. That is why the capability
of the hair removal laser to deliver high average power (i.e. high
pulse energy at high repetition rates) is the most important factor
to consider if one is looking for cost effective system. The typical
costs of hair removal procedures for the customers are shown in
Table 2 (this data must be interpreted as a general guideline only
and does not represent exact costs, special contracts and treatment
conditions may exist).
Return to questions
Table
2
TYPICAL
COSTS OF VARIOUS HAIR REMOVAL PROCEDURES
|
Area
Treated
|
Cost
per
average treatment
|
Number
of treatments
|
Treatment
time
|
|
Upper
lip
|
$115-$150
|
5-15
|
15
minutes
|
|
Chin
|
$115-$200
|
5-10
|
15-25
minutes
|
|
Bikini
Line
|
$200-$400
|
3-8
|
30-60
minutes
|
|
Under
Arms
|
$115-$150
|
5-10
|
15
minutes
|
|
Legs
(ankle to bikini)
|
$750-$1500
|
3-8
|
90-240
minutes
|
|
Man's
Back
|
$600-$1200
|
6-12
|
60-120
minutes
|
Finally, we
can say that actual treatment time depends on the laser hair removal
system technical parameters, certain body area being treated, particular
patient skin and hair type and practitioner's skills and experience.
Return to questions
|